ivan has inherited his mother’s 1963 chevrolet corvette, which he values at $45,000. he decides that he might be willing to sell it, so he posts it on craigslist for $55,000. samantha is interested and willing to pay up to $72,000 for one, so they agree on a price of $55,000 for the car.
ivan has inherited his mother’s 1963 chevrolet corvette, which he values at $45,000. he decides that he might be willing to sell it, so he posts it on craigslist for $55,000. samantha is interested and willing to pay up to $72,000 for one, so they agree on a price of $55,000 for the car.
Answer: It appears that you’ve provided a breakdown of the benefits and costs for Ivan and Samantha in the context of a potential transaction involving the 1963 Chevrolet Corvette. Based on the information you’ve provided:
For Ivan:
- Ivan’s Benefit: $55,000 (selling price)
- Ivan’s Cost: Benefits of the car ($45,000, which is his perceived value of the car)
For Samantha:
- Samantha’s Benefit: $72,000 (her maximum willingness to pay for the car)
- Samantha’s Cost: $55,000 (the agreed-upon price)
Both Ivan and Samantha would agree to the exchange because the transaction benefits both parties. Ivan is able to sell the car for more than he values it, and Samantha is able to acquire the car for less than she is willing to pay. This represents a mutually beneficial exchange, where both sides gain value.
It’s worth noting that this simplified analysis doesn’t take into account other factors such as negotiation, market conditions, or the actual condition of the car. Nonetheless, the exchange you’ve described seems to result in a positive outcome for both Ivan and Samantha.